0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Parkinson v Chief Constable of Dyfed Powys Police, Court of Appeal, 10 June 2004

8 July 2004
The issues

Road traffic – intoxicated pedestrian knocked over – Contributory Negligence – Permission to Appeal

The facts

This matter came before the Court of Appeal as a renewed Application for permission to appeal the decision of the Judge at Cardiff County Court. In that case the Claimant claimed damages for very serious injuries following an accident on 28 February 1998. He had walked out into the path of a car which was driven by a police officer. The Claimant was intoxicated and should have been aware of the presence of the car. The police officer was, however, driving at 40 mph past the parked taxi late at night in a built up area and the Judge found could and should have anticipated that there might be pedestrians in that sort of condition in the vicinity at the time. He found for the Claimant but apportioned liability 65% against the Defendant and 35% against the Claimant.

The Defendant appealed. The Defendant made an Application for permission to appeal.

The decision

1. Courts have repeatedly said that motor vehicles were dangerous instruments causing injury to others. The consequences of the negligence of the driver of the car was very substantially to increase the extent of the injury suffered by the Claimant. The Judge had heard evidence to the effect that the secondary and tertiary injuries which were the serious injuries would have been avoided altogether if the police car had been driven at an appropriate speed even though the accident might not have been avoided. The Judge found that without fault on the Claimant’s part there would have been no accident but that without fault on the police officer’s part the injuries would have been limited to less severe injuries. The Defendant’s fault was causative and more potent.
2. This was an impeccable way for the Judge to approach the question of apportionment.

Application for permission to appeal refused.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up