0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Edwards v Swindon & Marlborough NHS Trust, Bristol County Court, 28 May 2004

16 June 2004
The issues

Costs – Detailed Assessment – Disproportionality – Grade of Fee Earner – Insurance Premium – Success Fee

The facts

The Claimant brought an action for personal injuries. The accident occurred on 19th December 2000. The letter of claim was sent on 16th August 2001 but did not comply with the protocol because it did not state how the injury was caused. The Claimant’s solicitors clarified the point in letters dated 17th December 2001 and 3rd January 2002. Liability was admitted on 12th February 2002 reserving allegations of contributory negligence. The medical report and Schedule of Loss were disclosed on 5th March 2003. A settlement offer was made of £1,440.00 on 25th March 2003 and after a short negotiation period the case settled at £1,540.00 on 10th April 2003.

Part 8 Proceedings were commenced and a bill was served totalling £5,449.12. An offer of £3,500.00 had been put on 15th July 2003. The matter proceeded to Detailed Assessment. A success fee of 65% was claimed.

The decision

1. Base costs were disproportionate.
2. The matter had been handled by a Grade B Fee Earner. This was inappropriate and a Grade C Fee Earner would be allowed. The charging rate being reduced from £145.00 per hour to £125.00 per hour. Counsel’s fee for drafting Particulars of Claim be disallowed as negotiations were taking place. The insurance premium had been agreed at £560.00 rather than £840.00 claimed.
3. The success fee which was claimed at 65% was disallowed until the date of the risk assessment on 10th August 2001. Thereafter, a 33.3% success fee was allowed including the period after admission of liability. The bill was reduced to £3,368.03. The Claimant paid the Defendant’s costs of Detailed Assessment in the sum of £784.90.


For further information contact Marie Macfarlane – mariemacfarlane@veitchpenny.co.uk or John Allen at lcjdallen943@aol.com.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up