0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Morrow v Bowley, Exeter County Court, 25 March 2004

1 April 2004
The issues

Road Traffic – Cyclist – Cyclist on pavement – collision at junction.

The facts

The Claimant was cycling down Heavitree Road, Exeter in the same direction as a 40-foot coach. The Claimant approached a turn to his left hand and began to cross it. The Defendant driver was turning right into the same road from Heavitree Road, having been flashed by the bus driver. She had completed her turn into the side road at the time of the collision. The driver did not see the cyclist until the collision. The cyclist claimed he was on the road on the inside of the bus. The driver of the bus saw him “at 30 mph” and “head down” and saw him raise the front wheel to hop off the pavement straight into collision with the rear passenger door of the Defendant’s car. Cyclist and bike went over the driver’s car, and cyclist was injured.

The decision

1. The cyclist was on the pavement prior to the collision as evidenced by the position where he fell and the bus driver’s evidence.

2. The driver had completed her turn into the side road.

3. The driver had had no opportunity of avoiding the cyclist. Whilst it was reasonably foreseeable that a pedestrian might step off the pavement, it was not reasonably foreseeable that a cyclist travelling at speed would do so.

Claim dismissed.


For further information please contact Jessica Ross at jessicaross@veitchpenny.co.uk or Hugh Hamill at Hamill@12kbw.co.uk.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up