0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Spencer v Wood, Court of Appeal, 15 March 2004

18 March 2004
The issues

Costs – Conditional Fee Agreement – whether enforceable.

The facts

The Claimant having settled his claim sought costs from the Defendant. The Claimant’s case was funded with the benefit of a Conditional Fee Agreement. The Judge ruled that the Agreement was unenforceable, since it had not satisfied Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 Regulation 3(i)(b) namely that a Conditional Fee Agreement which provides for a success fee “must specify how much of the percentage increase, if any, relates to the cost to the legal representative of the postponement of the payment of his fees and expenses”. The Judge found that this breach was a material one in that it was not clear from the CFA what costs were recoverable from the Defendant. It was therefore not enforceable under Section 58 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

The decision

1. The County Court Judge had been correct. The CFA was unenforceable. There had been a clear breach and Hollins -v- Russell applied.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up