0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

R (Sacker) v West Yorkshire Coroner, House of Lords, 11 March 2004

18 March 2004
The issues

Coroner – State’s duty to investigate death – Human Rights Act 1982 Article 2.

The facts

The mother of the deceased, Helen Sacker applied for permission to proceed with her claim for a judicial review of the Coroner’s refusal to leave to the Inquest Jury the issue of whether her daughter’s suicide while on remand in prison was contributed to by neglect. The Claimant alleged that the Prison Authorities knew that she was a suicide risk but failed to take any preventative measures. At the Inquest, the Coroner had directed the Jury to identify only the issues of who the deceased was and how, when and where she came by her death and that they were not to frame their verdict so as to appear to decide any question of criminal liability or civil liability. The Coroner further stated that under Rule 43 Coroner’s Rules, he would report certain matters relating to the way in which the deceased had been treated in Prison to the appropriate authorities. The Court of Appeal had allowed the Appeal by the deceased’s mother. The West Yorkshire Coroner appealed against that decision to the House of Lords.

The decision

Following the decision in Middleton, the word “how” in Section 11 of the Coroner’s Act 1988 should be given and Rule 36(i)(b) of the Coroner’s Rules 1984 should be given a broader meaning “by what means and in what circumstances”. The consequence was that the Coroner would be able to exercise his discretion. The Coroner here exercised his discretion in the way indicated in the Middleton case. The Inquest had been deprived of its ability to address the positive obligation that Article 2 of the convention placed on steps to take effective operational measures to safeguard life. The appropriate course was to order a new Inquest.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up