0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Coates v Jaguar Cars Limited, Court of Appeal, 4 March 2004

11 March 2004
The issues

Trip – steps – handrail – Work Place (Health Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 Regulation 12(5).

The facts

The Claimant who was employed by the Defendant, tripped as he was going up a flight of steps at the Defendant’s factory. The flight consisted of four steps and the Claimant tripped on the third. The Judge at first instance found the Defendant negligent in failing to provide a handrail. Had the Defendant considered the risk that risk would have been safeguarded against by the provision of a handrail. However, the Defendant was not found in breach of Regulation 12, on the basis that the steps did not amount to a “staircase”. The Defendant appealed and the Claimant appealed the finding in respect of Regulation 12.

The decision

1. The effect of the Judge’s ruling was that no steps of this sort (which were common place) could be said to be safe unless a handrail was provided. There was no evidence that the steps posed any particular risk if they were ascended or descended with a normal degree of care. There had been a wrongful equation by the Judge of foreseeability of risk with the finding of duty to install a rail.

2. As to the Claimant’s argument that the fell steps within Regulation 5 (Maintenance of Equipment that had been Installed) was dismissed on the basis that since there had been no obligation under Regulation 12 (the Judge’s finding in that regard being unchallenged) to have installed a handrail, Regulation 5 did not apply.

Appeal allowed; Cross Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up