0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Yell Ltd v Garton, Court of Appeal, 2 February 2004

10 February 2004
The issues

Appeals – settlement – notification of Court – professional obligations.

The facts

The Claimant had appealed from the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The matter was listed before the Court of Appeal for 2 days to begin on a Monday. At 4.00 pm on the Friday, an offer had been put to the Claimant and by 6.00 pm Counsel had been told that the matter had been compromised and that the Appeal could be withdrawn. Counsel’s Clerks were told, but took the view that it was too late to tell the Court who would have to be told at 9.00 am on Monday.

The decision

1. There was a professional obligation on those advising the parties to litigation, to notify the Court if there was a chance that judicial time would be wasted in preparing for an Appeal, but was the subject of negotiations, which might lead to settlement.

2. The Civil Appeals Office should have been notified that there were negotiations carrying on whilst it was open. Even at 6.00 pm it would have been possible to have contacted the switchboard at the Royal Courts of Justice (which was 24 hour) to telephone the Clerk to the Senior Presiding Judge or even the Judges themselves who were reading in for the case.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up