0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Norman v Knowles Stourbridge, County Court, 6 November 2003

24 November 2003
The issues

Costs – RTA – each party equally to blame.

The facts

The Claimant was injured in a road traffic accident on the 19th April 2002 and claimed damages. The District Judge apportioned liability equally and gave Judgment to the Claimant for half of the agreed damages. The Defendant had not made a Part 36 Payment. The Judge ordered that each party should bear its own costs on the grounds that the Claimant’s evidence at Trial had differed from his pleaded case and his pre-action letter of claim. On this basis, he decided to depart from the general rule that costs should follow the event. The Claimant appealed on the basis that the judge had erred in the exercise of his discretion.

The decision

It was not generally for an Appellate Court to substitute its own Judgment for that of the Court below. The District Judge had been best placed to take a view as to costs. It was for the Claimant to persuade the Court that the District Judge had exercised his discretion wrongly.
The Judge had considered the relevant factors and the Order was within his discretion.

Appeal dismissed.

Comments

For further information please contact Marie Macfarlane at mariemacfarlane@veitchpenny.co.uk or Harry Steinberg of Counsel at Steinberg@12KBW.co.uk.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up