0370 270 6000

Network Telecom (Europe) Limited v Telephone Systems International Inc, High Court, 21 October 2003

27 October 2003
The issues

Without Notice Applications – Ex Parte Applications – Disclosure.

The facts

The Claimant had made a Without Notice Application for service out of the jurisdiction. The parties were involved in two separate proceedings in New York, arising out of a contract between them. The Claimant’s Application was in respect of an action in respect of a demand for payment of sums under the ivoices rendered for goods and services, which were the subject of the proceedings in New York. The New York proceedings were not mentioned in the Application. The Master granted the Application. The Defendant applied to set the Order aside. The Defendant appealed.

The decision

1. The Master had erred in law. The claimant had a continuing duty to make full and frank disclosure until such time as they acted on the Order that they had obtained.

2. In this case, the Claimant should have informed the Court of the New York proceedings before it served the Order that it had obtained.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up