0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Skerratt v Linfax Limited, Court of Appeal, 6 May 2003

14 May 2003
The issues


The facts

The Claimant had had an accident at the Defendant’s Go Kart track on the 4th April 1997. In November 2001 he was told by a Solicitor (acting for another person injured at the same track) that he might have a claim. The Claimant had signed a form agreeing that in taking a ride on the track he was doing so at his own risk. He issued proceedings on the 15th January 2002. The Defendant pleaded limitation. The matter came before the District Judge who found that there had been no deliberate concealment of material facts by the Defendant and that the Claimant being an intelligent and articulate man could have found out that he had a claim had he consulted lawyers. It was not therefore appropriate to exercise the discretion under Section 33. The District Judge also found that the Defendant would be prejudiced by facing a claim 5 years after the accident. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

1. Matters relating to concealment had taken place before the accident.

2. The law relating to concealment (Section 32(i)(b)) had to be narrowly construed and the District Judge was right to find that there had been no relevant concealment.

3. Even if the Claimant honestly believed he had no cause of action until he was told, if there was blame to be attached to him then that was a relevant consideration for the Court to consider in deciding whether to exercise the discretion. The District Judge was entitled to come to the view he had reached.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up