0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Grace v Tanner, Court of Appeal, 27 February 2003

4 March 2003
The issues

RTA – road traffic – roundabout – motorcycle.

The facts

The claimant and defendant were travelling on dual carriageway in the same direction. The defendant, driving her car was in the inside lane. The claimant, on a motorcycle was in the outside lane. They approached a roundabout. The defendant mis-judged her exit and continuing to travel in the nearside lane, went around the roundabout again, intending to take her correct exit on the second approach. As she was going around she was struck by the claimant’s motorcycle in the outer lane as he tried to turn off the roundabout. The claimant said that he assumed the driver was going to take the same turning that he was turning into. The judge dismissed the claim, finding that the claimant had failed to keep a proper look out and had made a dangerous assumption. The claimant appealed.

The decision
  1. If a driver in the nearside lane of a dual carriageway passes the first exist and approaches another that was not the intended exit, the driver had to be aware of the possibility of another driver in the outside carriageway wanting to take that exit.
  2. The defendant had not taken account of that possibility and was negligent. She failed to appreciate the potential danger to traffic using the exit she was passing where the traffic had been lulled into the false belief that she was going to use that exit.
  3. The defendant was 50% liable.

Appeal allowed to that extent.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up