0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Day v High Performance Sports Limited, High Court

14 March 2003
The issues

Sport – fall – risk assessment

The facts

The Claimant fell whilst climbing on an indoor climbing wall. She had failed to tie onto her top rope and then to her belayer on the ground below. The Duty Manager tried to rescue her. The way he tried was inappropriate and caused her to fall. The Claimant was a reasonably experienced climber and she had confirmed acceptance when she joined of the conditions of use and the rules of the Centre, which clearly put the burden on her to ensure that she was tied on when she climbed.

The decision

1. The Duty Manager had a duty to assess the risks inherent and to take reasonable means to reduce the likelihood of injury.

2. That included training of staff and the provision of suitable equipment to deal with emergencies.

3. The Court also had to take into account the exigencies of the situation.

4. The Centre trained staff – there were workshops for employees. Its conditions of use and the rules tried to ensure that users of the Centre were also careful for their own safety.

5. The Duty Manager did not consider any other rescue option, because he did not think there was any other available in the emergency situation. Although with hindsight another option might have succeeded, his error was one of judgement and not of negligence.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up