0370 270 6000

Day v High Performance Sports Limited, High Court

14 March 2003
The issues

Sport – fall – risk assessment

The facts

The Claimant fell whilst climbing on an indoor climbing wall. She had failed to tie onto her top rope and then to her belayer on the ground below. The Duty Manager tried to rescue her. The way he tried was inappropriate and caused her to fall. The Claimant was a reasonably experienced climber and she had confirmed acceptance when she joined of the conditions of use and the rules of the Centre, which clearly put the burden on her to ensure that she was tied on when she climbed.

The decision

1. The Duty Manager had a duty to assess the risks inherent and to take reasonable means to reduce the likelihood of injury.

2. That included training of staff and the provision of suitable equipment to deal with emergencies.

3. The Court also had to take into account the exigencies of the situation.

4. The Centre trained staff – there were workshops for employees. Its conditions of use and the rules tried to ensure that users of the Centre were also careful for their own safety.

5. The Duty Manager did not consider any other rescue option, because he did not think there was any other available in the emergency situation. Although with hindsight another option might have succeeded, his error was one of judgement and not of negligence.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up