0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Matthews v Ministry of Defence, House of Lords

18 February 2003
The issues

Human Rights – Crown Proceedings Act 1947 – Section 10.

The facts

This was an Appeal from the Court of Appeal on the part of the Claimant. The Claimant had served in the Royal Navy between 1955 and 1968 and was allegedly exposed to asbestos fibres. The Ministry of Defence denied the claim, relying on Section 10 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947. That Act was subsequently repealed, save for claims in respect of matters arising before 15th May 1987. The Claimant argued that Section 10 infringed his Article 6 rights. The Court of Appeal found that Article 6 was concerned with the Judicial process. There was a distinction between procedural and substantive law. Procedural rules were subject to Article 6. Other Rules setting out what rights and liabilities might arise under Civil Law were substantive Rules and were not subject to Article 6. The Court of Appeal found that there was therefore no incompatibility between Section 10 and Article 6.

The decision

The Appeal would be dismissed. Section 10 was not a mere procedural bar. It was not a procedural limitation and was not incompatible with Article 6.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up