0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Marlton v Tektronix UK Holdings Limited, Chancery Division

18 February 2003
The issues

Specific disclosure – computers – e-mails

The facts

This case concerned the sale by Claimant of share capital under an Acquisition Agreement. The Defendant was due to pay-deferred consideration and failed to do so. Its excuse was that there was a shortfall in the next asset value and that it had delivered draft accounts by e-mail to the Claimant to two e-mail addresses. The Claimant argued firstly that e-mail was not a specified method of delivery under the Agreement and so the delivery was not valid and secondly, that an e-mail addressed to one account had not been received and that the one addressed to the other account was not opened until the 16th October, 4 days after it was sent and 1 day after the final deadline for delivery. The Defendant sought an Order for inspection of the contents of the hard discs of the computers, any backup available, and any server over which the Claimant had power or control.

The decision

For the purposes of Part 31 of the CPR “documents” included computer databases. Since the issue between the parties relating to the receipt of e-mails, all documents tending to show the date of receipt or non-receipt were potentially disclosable. All such materials should be disclosed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up