0370 270 6000

Marlton v Tektronix UK Holdings Limited, Chancery Division

18 February 2003
The issues

Specific disclosure – computers – e-mails

The facts

This case concerned the sale by Claimant of share capital under an Acquisition Agreement. The Defendant was due to pay-deferred consideration and failed to do so. Its excuse was that there was a shortfall in the next asset value and that it had delivered draft accounts by e-mail to the Claimant to two e-mail addresses. The Claimant argued firstly that e-mail was not a specified method of delivery under the Agreement and so the delivery was not valid and secondly, that an e-mail addressed to one account had not been received and that the one addressed to the other account was not opened until the 16th October, 4 days after it was sent and 1 day after the final deadline for delivery. The Defendant sought an Order for inspection of the contents of the hard discs of the computers, any backup available, and any server over which the Claimant had power or control.

The decision

For the purposes of Part 31 of the CPR “documents” included computer databases. Since the issue between the parties relating to the receipt of e-mails, all documents tending to show the date of receipt or non-receipt were potentially disclosable. All such materials should be disclosed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up