0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Grealis v Opuni, Court of Appeal, 28 January 2003

5 February 2003
The issues

Road traffic – overtaking – motorcycle.

The facts

The Claimant was an 18 year old student working part-time as a Pizza Delivery boy. In July 1997 sometime after 11.00 pm, he was riding a moped along the A5 intending to turn right to make his last delivery. The traffic lights were on green and there were some other vehicles in the filter lane also waiting to make a right hand turn. The Claimant jumped the queue and instead of remaining in the filter lane to turn right, passed to the right of the centre bollard before making his turn. He collided with a car being driven across the junction on the other side of the carriageway. The car was travelling at something between 37 and 39 mph. The speed limit was 30 mph. The collision was between the front of the car and the rear wheel of the moped and the Judge found in probability that the collision would have been avoided if the car had been travelling at a slower speed. Nonetheless, the driver’s breach of the Road Traffic Acts could not be equated with a breach of duty of which the Judge found none on the driver’s part. The claim was dismissed. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The Defendant should have been aware of the possibility of vehicles that were queuing to cross the road miss-judging the speed of oncoming traffic and crossing at an inappropriate time. It was negligent in those circumstances to drive at a speed in excess of the speed limit. The Claimant bore a heavy responsibility to the extent of 80%. Appeal allowed.

training and events


Insurer Insight event London office

Developed for insurers, this exclusive series of events will provide you with operational and practical insights from across the legal spectrum.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Insurance Product Value and the duty to act in the best interests of customers: risks from intermediary remuneration

On 19 November 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) published “Finalised guidance” (FG19/5) for “insurance product manufacturers and distributors”.


Legal updates

Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?

The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.


Legal updates

Noise-induced hearing loss claims – documentation and the expert engineer

Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.


Legal updates

SRA Standards and Regulations November 2019

On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up