0370 270 6000

Watson Wyatt v Maxwell Batley, High Court, 14 November 2002

11 December 2002
The issues


The facts

The Societe Internationale De Telecommunications Aeronautiques (SITA) had a dispute with Watson Wyatt over advice provided. Watson Wyatt in turn sued Maxwell Batley seeking a contribution to a settlement with SITA. Maxwell Batley won but Claimants applied to disallow part of Defendant’s costs on account of refusal to mediate.

The decision

Costs would not be disallowed. The request to mediate had been made in an effort to “dragoon, browbeat and bully” the Defendants into mediation with the aim of forcing the firm to contribute to a settlement with SITA. The way in which Watson Wyatt sought to press Maxwell Batley to join the mediation was “disagreeable and off-putting”.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up