0370 270 6000

Neal v Jones, Court of Appeal, 31 October 2002

6 November 2002
The issues

Partnership – loss of earnings – Ward -v- Newalls – Partnership

The facts

The Claimant suffered a serious road traffic accident. An issue arose as to the nature of his relationship with his “partner” in his motorcycle business. The question was whether or not there was a true partnership and, if so, whether the Claimant was entitled to his full loss of earnings or only that amount representing his share in the business.

The decision

1. Admitting fresh evidence the Court of Appeal found for the relevant period that there was a true partnership.

2. Following Kent -v- British Railways Board (where one member of a two person partnership was injured, the injured person could only claim for losses to the partnership to the extent of that person alone) past loss of earnings would be halved.


It is interesting to see Kent followed by a 3 man Court of Appeal particularly in the light of the comments in Kemp -v- Kemp (5 – 092 to the effect that Kent was a decision on its own facts and after Ward -v- Newalls would not be followed).

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up