0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Munden v Bunten, Peterborough County Court, 21 January 2002

20 November 2002
The issues

Psychiatric damage – neck.

The facts

The Claimant, a female Meals on Wheels delivery driver aged 44 at the date of the accident and 48 at the date of Trial, suffered minor tissue injuries to the neck and significant psychological injury after a water skier collided with her jet ski, throwing her into the sea. Medical evidence showed that the Claimant had suffered a soft tissue sprain, from which she had fully recovered within a month. Her major injury was psychological, although the Claimant had substantial pre-existing psychological problems. The Claimant had thought that she would drown after being pulled under the water by the skier’s rope. She developed a fear of water and thought about the accident constantly. She suffered nightmares of being trapped under water. Her symptoms were particularly severe during the first 12 months, during which time her sexual activity was reduced. Her symptoms began to improve and she resumed swimming 2 years after the accident. Her symptoms did not impact on her ability to work.

Expert evidence supported a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. At Trial however, the only psychological symptoms attributable to the accident were occasional nightmares, which were reducing in frequency.

The decision

The Judge found that the Claimant would make a full recovery in the near future and held that the appropriate award for general damages lay in the JSB bracket for most moderate Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Accordingly, he assessed general damages at £6,500.00.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up