0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Re Keynsham Cemetery, Bath Wells Consistory Court, 18 September 2002

8 October 2002
The issues

Cemetery – Headstones – Local Authorities Cemeteries Order 1977

The facts

Keynsham Town Council, the Local Burial Authority, exercised its powers under Article 16 of the Local Authorities Cemeteries Order 1977 to carry out a safety inspection of Keynsham Cemetery and to lay flat unsafe tombstones. It had not applied to the consistory Courts for a faculty for minor works. The matter came before the Bath & Wells Consistory Court.

The decision

1. Keynsham Town Council had exercised its powers without first obtaining a faculty.

2. It had acted in good faith and faced with the prospect of civil or criminal liability in respect of the state of the tombstones in the cemetery the remedy chosen was not unreasonable given the need to avoid the clear risk to injury of people using the cemetery. The Burial Authority’s actions in making the affected memorials safe immediately after testing and without giving the owners of the tombstones any time to effect a repair was reasonable and a confirmatory faculty would issue subject to certain conditions.

3. As far as future control was concerned, the 50 kg test by a topple tester was too harsh and in future monuments should only be laid flat if they failed testing to a 30 kg standard by topple tester or similar device. Where it was reasonably practical to do so in future, the burial authority should give any person known to be interested in the memorial which failed a topple test due notice and reasonable opportunity to remedy the defect.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up