0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Hadoulis v Trinatours Ltd, High Court

8 October 2002
The issues

Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 – Fibromyalgia – Work Stations – upper limb disorders

The facts

Claimant suffered from upper limb disorder and fibromyalgia which she alleged was caused by her employment with the Defendant Travel Agency. She began working for the Defendant in 1995 as a Booking Clerk. She had to use computers. She complained of back pain in March 1998 and was later diagnosed as suffering from a work related upper limb disorder. She claimed that her injuries were caused by excessive workload, lack of training as to her work and work station, too few breaks – and the provision of an unsuitable chair.

The decision

1. The Defendant had breached the Display Screen Equipment Regulations because there had been no assessment of the Claimant’s work station as required by Regulation 2. Moreover, no health & safety training had been given as required by Regulations 6 and 7.

2. There had been no other breaches of the regulations and the Court found no breach of any common law duty of care.

3. The Claimant failed on causation. It could not be said that if the breaches had not occurred the Claimant’s problems would not have existed. Claim dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up