0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Goddard and Another v Greenwood, Court of Appeal

30 October 2002
The issues

Pedestrian – jogger – road traffic accident.

The facts

The Claimants were jogging on the A20 in Dover when they were hit by the Defendant in his vehicle at a junction controlled by traffic lights. He came up behind a lorry, which was stationary at the signals in the nearside lane of 3. Noting that the signals were red, the Defendant moved into the middle lane to go alongside the lorry and as he did so, the lights changed to green and he continued on without stopping. As he passed the lorry, he heard it sound its horn and then saw the joggers crossing the road from his nearside. He did not stop in time and the Claimants suffered serious injuries. The Judge found for the Defendant.

The Claimants appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge was not entitled to find that there was no liability at all.

2. The Defendant’s view of the crossing was obscured by the presence of the lorry in the nearside lane and the fact that the lights changed to green did not give him an absolute right to continue. A reasonably careful driver would have anticipated the possibility of a pedestrian being on the crossing, particularly in view of the fact that the lights had just changed and that the lorry had not moved.

3. The Defendant was therefore primarily liable. The Trial Judge had indicated that had he not found for the Defendant, he could have found contributory negligence of 80%.

That finding could not be interfered with and the Appeal was allowed subject to a finding of 80% contributory negligence against the Claimants.

training and events


Insurer Insight event London office

Developed for insurers, this exclusive series of events will provide you with operational and practical insights from across the legal spectrum.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?

The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.


Legal updates

Noise-induced hearing loss claims – documentation and the expert engineer

Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.


Legal updates

SRA Standards and Regulations November 2019

On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.


Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up