0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Dyson Limited v Hoover Limited, Chancery Division

30 October 2002
The issues

Costs – Part 36 Offer – Claimant accepting Part 36 Payment more advantageous than previous Part 36 Offer made by Claimant – indemnity costs.

The facts

The Claimant had made a Part 36 Offer in this infringement of patent case, which was worth about £1.5 million. The Defendant had subsequently made a Part 36 Payment of £4.0 million which was accepted. The Claimant argued that pursuant to Civil Procedure Rules 36.21 it was entitled to its costs on an indemnity basis until the date of its acceptance of the Part 36 Payment.

The decision

1. Where a Claimant accepted a Part 36 Payment, the Court had no discretion as to the basis of costs. See Part 36.13 (4). Even if the Court had a discretion, which it did not, it was not a discretion which could ever be properly exercised, since it was impossible to determine the reasonableness of the rejection by the Defendant of the initial Part 36 Offer without going behind the parties’ settlement.


This might prove rather a useful case in those difficult circumstances where indemnity costs loom!

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up