0370 270 6000

DAS International Ltd v Manley, Court of Appeal, 15 October 2002

22 October 2002
The issues

Road traffic – avoiding pedestrian – flagging down approaching car.

The facts

The weather conditions were wet and dark. The Defendant was driving on a dual carriageway, when he saw a pedestrian on the side of the road. He swerved to his offside and hit the central reservation, bouncing off into a ditch on the nearside. He got out and walked back up to the carriageway to try to flag down help. The Claimant’s jeep approached the scene. Its driver saw the Defendant and swerved to avoid him, also hitting the central reservation, bouncing off and landing in the ditch. The Claimant argued that the Defendant was in the centre of the nearside lane, when flagging down help. A witness thought that the Defendant had been standing between 2 or 3 feet into the lane. The Judge found the Defendant’s actions reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances.

The Claimant appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge had to measure the Defendant’s actions against those of the reasonable person, in relation to the likelihood and significance of the risk or harm.

2. It was unreasonable for the Defendant to have moved from the side of the road into the lane, however far in he moved.

3. The Judge’s view that the Defendant was not negligent was wrong.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up