0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Butcher v Cornwall County Council, Court of Appeal

30 October 2011
The issues

Contributory negligence – blame/blameworthiness – causation – door hitting Claimant.

The facts

The Claimant worked for the Cornwall Fire Brigade as a Storeman. At the premises at which he worked there was an external door, which opened outward to a 90 degree angle. There had previously been a hook and eye device which allowed the door to be secured in the open position. At the time of the accident, this was not there. The Claimant was working outside the door when it was suddenly blown open by wind and hit him on the head. He had previously been walking back and forth through the doorway and thought he had properly secured it closed on its latching mechanism. He acknowledged in evidence that he had not in fact closed it properly. The Defendant argued that it was the Claimant’s failure to shut the door properly that caused the accident, and that they had supplied a safe method of securing the door in its closed position and there was no duty to provide an alternative method – i.e. of securing it open.

The decision

1. The Defendant was in breach of its duty for failing to provide a sufficient mechanism, whether a hook and eye device or some other to hold the door open. The Judge had found that had there been something in place, the Claimant would have used it.

2. Had the Claimant shut the door properly, the accident could have been averted. The Judge’s finding of 10% contributory negligence was too little. A substantial measure of blame had to fall upon the Claimant and the more appropriate percentage would have been one half. However, the Judge found that the Claimant was less blameworthy and accordingly, the Judge’s Order would be adjusted to a finding of one-third contributory negligence.

Appeal allowed in part.


For further information with regard to this case please contact markhammerton@vpinsurance.net

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up