0370 270 6000

Accident Management Limited v Philpott, 25 September 2002

25 September 2002
The issues

Credit hire – professional negligence.

The facts

This was a liability only Trial. The Defendant Barrister advised Western in April 1996 following instructions to review the terms of its credit hire agreements in the light of Consumer Credit Act Litigation. His advice was in error following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Zoam -v- Rouamba. In particular, he advised that the 12 month clause should contain the words “12 months from the date of this agreement”, which did not in fact limit the period for payment of the hire charges to one “not exceeding 12 months beginning with the date of the agreement” but to a period of 12 months starting on the day following the date of the agreement. Moreover, the amendment did not include an express requirement on the hirer to pay hire charges within 12 months in any event and the agreement as re-drafted, did not stipulate that hire charges be payable in no more than 4 instalments.

The decision

The Defendant was clearly negligent in respect of the first complaint as had been identified in Zoam -v- Rouamba. The Court was satisfied that he was negligent in respect of the remaining allegations of negligence.


After the long war on the part of Insurers on this particular front, Insurers may not be surprised at this particular offshoot of satellite litigation!

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up