0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Accident Management Limited v Philpott, 25 September 2002

25 September 2002
The issues

Credit hire – professional negligence.

The facts

This was a liability only Trial. The Defendant Barrister advised Western in April 1996 following instructions to review the terms of its credit hire agreements in the light of Consumer Credit Act Litigation. His advice was in error following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Zoam -v- Rouamba. In particular, he advised that the 12 month clause should contain the words “12 months from the date of this agreement”, which did not in fact limit the period for payment of the hire charges to one “not exceeding 12 months beginning with the date of the agreement” but to a period of 12 months starting on the day following the date of the agreement. Moreover, the amendment did not include an express requirement on the hirer to pay hire charges within 12 months in any event and the agreement as re-drafted, did not stipulate that hire charges be payable in no more than 4 instalments.

The decision

The Defendant was clearly negligent in respect of the first complaint as had been identified in Zoam -v- Rouamba. The Court was satisfied that he was negligent in respect of the remaining allegations of negligence.


After the long war on the part of Insurers on this particular front, Insurers may not be surprised at this particular offshoot of satellite litigation!

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up