0370 270 6000

Taylor v Williamsons (A Firm), Court of Appeal, 17 July 2002

23 July 2002
The issues

Judicial bias – Judgment handed down prior to submissions.

The facts

Judge McGonigal sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court in Newcastle-upon-Tyne heard a preliminary issue in a professional negligence claim. At the conclusion of the evidence, the Judge directed Counsel to make closing submissions in writing before the 28th September. On the 27th September, he handed down a draft Judgment with a note that it would be handed down formally on the 26th October. No submissions had been received by the Judge at that point. The Claimant made an Application for an Order for the recall of the Judgment and that the Judge recuse himself and that there be a re-trial.

The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The Judge had put himself in the most unfortunate plight. It was an extraordinary but genuine failure of recollection on his part. There was no evidence of bias however. The Judge had expressed himself as prepared to reconsider his decision and had acknowledged his error as soon as it had been pointed out to him.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up