0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Newbold v Ministry of Defence, Queen's Bench Division, 27 June 2002

9 July 2002
The issues

Fibrosing Alveolitis – exposure to petrol and diesel fumes.

The facts

This was a claim made by the Estate and the Dependant on behalf of C who had died at the age of 64 from bronchopneumonia, which was secondary to chronic Fibrosing Alveolitis. He had been employed for just over 40 years by the Defendant as a motor mechanic. Over that time, he had had to fill fuel tanks, which he did by syphoning from a can. Over this time, he had inhaled petrol and diesel fumes.

An issue arose as to whether the inhalation of fumes had been responsible for his condition, amongst other issues relevant to liability.

The decision

1. Although the Defendants had been negligent in exposing the Claimant to an unsafe system of work, it could not be shown on a balance of probabilities that the exposure to the fumes had caused the Fibrosingalveolitis. The medical evidence connecting the two was weak and fell far short of being a probability in the current state of medical knowledge.

2. Even if it had been a probable, rather than a merely possible association between fumes and the condition that C had died from, the clinical picture fitted a well established pattern and age/sex profile for cryptogenic Fibrosing Alveolitis (ie Fibrosing Alveolitis with no known cause).

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up