0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Larkin v Meehan, Cardiff Crown Court, 21 August 2001

16 July 2002
The issues

Neck – whiplash type injury

The facts

The Claimant, a female factory worker, suffered a soft tissue injury to the neck in an RTA (aged 28 at date of accident and 30 at trial). She attended hospital 2-3 days after the accident and was given a soft collar. She suffered severe pain and stiffness for the first 4-6 weeks and then made a gradual recovery. When she was seen 9 months after the accident she complained of intermittent pain in her neck, which was provoked by bending or lifting heavy objects.

She had always been able to undertake most of her domestic and leisure activities and had taken no time off work. However clinical examination revealed significantly restricted movement in the cervical spine.

She was again examined 27 months after the accident and still complained of intermittent neck pain, caused by strenuous activity. Physiotherapy had only provided temporary relief. But there had been significant improvement in her neck movement.

Prognosis – 50% chance of remaining asymptomatic after 10 years – probable long-term/permanent neck pain which was categorised as mild and intermittent and did not interfere with her activities. No deterioration anticipated.

The decision

The Claimant was awarded £6,000.00 General Damages.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up