0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Gulliksen v Pembrokeshire County Council

16 July 2002
The issues

Public footpaths – highway – tripping.

The facts

The Claimant was using a footpath through a Council Estate. He tripped on the edge of a manhole cover. The Judge at first instance dismissed the claim on the ground that although the path was a highway, the hazard was caused by non-feasance rather than mis-feasance and therefore the Local Authority’s land owner was not liable. However, the Council was liable as Highway Authority and in breach of its positive duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. The Defendant went to the High Court Judge, who allowed the Appeal on the grounds that the path was not a highway maintainable at public expense. The Claimant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

1. Section 32(I) of the 1980 Highways Act referred to “highways maintainable at public expense” which included all highways that were already maintainable under the Highways Act 1959.

2. Section 38 also included highways constructed by any Council under Part 5 of the Housing Act 1957.

3. The Court would assume that the paths in the Council Estate had been built under that provision since no authority could provide housing except under statutory authority.

The path therefore was a highway maintainable at public expense and given the failure of a Section 58 Defence, the Claimant would succeed.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up