0370 270 6000

Gulliksen v Pembrokeshire County Council

16 July 2002
The issues

Public footpaths – highway – tripping.

The facts

The Claimant was using a footpath through a Council Estate. He tripped on the edge of a manhole cover. The Judge at first instance dismissed the claim on the ground that although the path was a highway, the hazard was caused by non-feasance rather than mis-feasance and therefore the Local Authority’s land owner was not liable. However, the Council was liable as Highway Authority and in breach of its positive duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. The Defendant went to the High Court Judge, who allowed the Appeal on the grounds that the path was not a highway maintainable at public expense. The Claimant appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

1. Section 32(I) of the 1980 Highways Act referred to “highways maintainable at public expense” which included all highways that were already maintainable under the Highways Act 1959.

2. Section 38 also included highways constructed by any Council under Part 5 of the Housing Act 1957.

3. The Court would assume that the paths in the Council Estate had been built under that provision since no authority could provide housing except under statutory authority.

The path therefore was a highway maintainable at public expense and given the failure of a Section 58 Defence, the Claimant would succeed.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up