0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Giambrone v JMC Holidays, Nelson J

2 July 2002
The issues

Costs – generic letters – indemnity principle.

The facts

This was an exceptional and difficult case involving a group action relating to 652 people who had been food-poisoned at a hotel in Majorca. When it came to Detailed Assessment, certain matters of a preliminary nature were dealt with by the Costs Judge in advance of the Detailed Assessment and with a subject matter of Appeal. Firstly, there was a question as to the allowable sum for generic letters prepared by Paralegals. The letters were repetitive and involved only the pressing of a button on a computer. The Claimant sought a flat sum of £10.00 per letter. The Defendants offered £1.00 per letter. The Costs Judge had indicated that £1.00 was the appropriate rate.

A second issue related to the indemnity principle. The Costs Judge, on the basis of correspondence which he had come across during his reading, had ordered the Claimant to make a witness statement in relation to the indemnity principle. He had further ordered that that statement and the exhibits be disclosed not only to him but to the paying party.

The decision

1. Generic letters – £1.00 per letter was plainly insufficient. £3.30 per letter would be allowed.

2. The Costs Judge was wrong to order disclosure to the paying party. He should have complied with paragraph 40.14 of the Costs Practice Direction and directed Claimant to produce a witness statement and relevant documents to him alone and thereafter he should have put Claimants to their election as to whether to disclose the documents to rely upon their contents or to decline disclosure and rely on witness statements alone.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up