0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Matthews v Ministry of Defence, Court of Appeal

7 June 2002
The issues

Humans rights – Crown Proceedings Act 1947 – Section 10

The facts

This was a claim in which the Claimant, who had served in the Royal Navy between 1955-1968, was allegedly exposed to asbestos fibres. The MOD denied the claim relying on Section 10 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 (now of course repealed, save for claims in respect of matters arising before 15 May 1987). The Claimant argued that Section10 infringed the Claimant’s Article 6 rights. The Judge at first instance found that Section 10 was incompatible (finding also the Claimant was entitled to rely on Article 6 even though this claim arose from facts prior to the coming into force of the 1998 Act – following Wilson, the First County Trust Limited number 2).

The decision

1. Article 6 was concerned with judicial process. There was a distinction between procedural and substantive law. Procedural rules (regulating Court procedure) were subject to Article 6. Other rules which set out what rights and liabilities might arise under Civil Law were substantive rules and were not so subject. The effect of Section 10 was substantive and not procedural. Article 6 was not therefore engaged. There was therefore no imcompatability between Section 10 and Article 6.

Appeal allowed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up