0370 270 6000

Warner v Huntingdon District Council, Court of Appeal

21 May 2002
The issues

Refuse collection – lifting – manual handling.

The facts

The Claimant was a Dustbin Man. He gave up work in 1996 after suffering lower back pain.

He alleged that his back injury was the result of lifting dust bags. The Council admitted he had received no manual handling training or information about the weight of the bags. There had been a risk assessment in 1995 which had recommended that courses be arranged in respect of the manual handling of dustbins. They had not been arranged. The Judge at first instance dismissed the claim, finding that the Claimant was an experienced man and that it was not clear what benefits training would have given to the Claimant and moreover, that it was possible that the injury was due to a degenerate back. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

1. The issue was not the question of whether or not there had been a breach, but whether the breach had been the cause of the Claimant’s condition.

2. There was no evidence that the way in which the Claimant did his work would have been affected in anyway by training.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up