0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Sayers v Clarke-Walker, Court of Appeal

21 May 2002
The issues

Appeals out of time – principles to be considered.

The facts

The Claimant made Application for an extension of time for appealing and for permission to appeal from two Orders of Buckley J. The Orders were dated 12th October 2001 and 17th October 2001. The Appeal was lodged on 20th December 2001. The Appeal was late because Claimant’s Solicitors erroneously believed that time did not run until the Order of the Court below had been sealed. The Application was initially refused on papers by Lord Justice Sedley as “irretrievably out of time”. The renewed Application came before a three Judge Court of Appeal.

The decision

1. Solicitors should be expected to understand the substantial changes to the new appeals regime.

2. Extensions of time were governed by Civil Procedure Rules 52.6. The Court should also take into account its general power to extend time under Civil Procedure Rules 3.1 and of course the over-riding objective in Civil Procedure Rules 1.1.

3. When considering any Application of this sort, the Court should have regard to the check list in Civil Procedure Rules 3.9.

4. In the light of the factors set out in that check list, it would be disproportionate to prevent the Appeal proceeding, at least so far as giving the opportunity to the Appellant of addressing the Court on merits of the Appeal.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up