0370 270 6000

Sayers v Clarke-Walker, Court of Appeal

21 May 2002
The issues

Appeals out of time – principles to be considered.

The facts

The Claimant made Application for an extension of time for appealing and for permission to appeal from two Orders of Buckley J. The Orders were dated 12th October 2001 and 17th October 2001. The Appeal was lodged on 20th December 2001. The Appeal was late because Claimant’s Solicitors erroneously believed that time did not run until the Order of the Court below had been sealed. The Application was initially refused on papers by Lord Justice Sedley as “irretrievably out of time”. The renewed Application came before a three Judge Court of Appeal.

The decision

1. Solicitors should be expected to understand the substantial changes to the new appeals regime.

2. Extensions of time were governed by Civil Procedure Rules 52.6. The Court should also take into account its general power to extend time under Civil Procedure Rules 3.1 and of course the over-riding objective in Civil Procedure Rules 1.1.

3. When considering any Application of this sort, the Court should have regard to the check list in Civil Procedure Rules 3.9.

4. In the light of the factors set out in that check list, it would be disproportionate to prevent the Appeal proceeding, at least so far as giving the opportunity to the Appellant of addressing the Court on merits of the Appeal.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up