0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Newman v Folkes & Another, Court of Appeal

8 May 2002
The issues

Cost of Care – Gratuitous Care Rates

The facts

The Claimant was seriously injured in a road traffic accident. Amongst the heads of damage were cost of care. £100,000.00 was awarded in respect of this item of claim. The care was provided gratuitously by the wife. The Judge made the award without a discount from the commercial rate paid to care assistants. The Defendant appealed inter alia against the award for past and future care.

The decision

1. The Claimant was potentially a violent individual demanding attention both day and night.

2. A carer would receive an increased rate for unsocial hours.

3. The Judge had calculated this award on the cost of care on the basis of flat rates.

4. There was no conventional discount which had to be applied where care was provided gratuitously – see Evans v Pontypridd Roofing Limited.

The Court quoted May LJ “this Court should avoid putting first instance Judges in too restrictive a straight jacket, such as might happen if it was said that the means of assessing a proper recompense for services provided gratuitously by a family carer had to be assessed in a particular way or ways. Circumstances vary enormously and what is appropriate and just in one case may no be so in another%u2026 the assessment is of an amount as a whole. The means of reaching the assessment must depend on what is appropriate to the individual case”.

The Judge had looked at this head of damages. He had made no error of principal and the exercise of discretion did not produce a figure that was played upon.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up