0370 270 6000

Douce v Staffordshire County Council, Court of Appeal, 19 April 2002

8 May 2002
The issues

Economic Loss – Registered Homes Act 1984 – Care Homes

The facts

Staffordshire County Council were deemed negligent by the Claimant for damages for economic loss. It was alleged that they were negligent in their construing the 1984 Act as requiring “staffing to capacity” of care homes. As a result, the Claimant’s alleged, there had been overpayment of wages which they sought to recover.

The County Council claimed its actions were matters of discretion which they should not be liable unless there actions were so unreasonable as to be outside that discretion. They applied for summary judgment. They were refused and appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The decision

These matters turned on questions of mixed fact and law. This is an area of developing juris prudence. A full Trial was required to ascertain whether the Council owed a duty to owners and managers of care homes for negligently caused economic loss.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up