0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Mawdsley v Cosmos Air Plc

23 April 2002
The issues

Holidays – Package Holidays and Package Tour Regulations 1992 – stairs.

The facts

The Claimant booked a holiday in Turkey from Cosmos. She and her husband were going down stairs carrying their daughter in a pushchair, when she fell. It appeared that she lost her footing. No exact cause was established. The Claimant argued that Cosmos was liable for the injuries on the basis that the brochure stated that the hotel restaurant was accessible via a lift. It was not. Further, the brochure said the hotel was suitable for children. Claimant said it was not. A breach of duty under Regulation 4 of the Package, Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tour Regulations 1992 was alleged. In addition, the Claimant sued in misrepresentation and for breach of contract. Cosmos argued that it was not reasonably foreseeable that personal injuries would come from merely descending stairs, about which there was nothing dangerous in themselves. The Judge at first instance found that the hotel was unsuitable for children because there was so many steps that would be needed to descend or climb in order to get to the restaurant. He found that it was foreseeable that the Claimant would lose her footing whilst descending the stairs two or three times a day carrying a child’s pushchair. He found it reasonable for the Claimant to assume that the phrase “lifts (in main building)” in the brochure implied access to everything including the restaurant.

The Defendant appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge’s interpretation of the phrase in the brochure was correct.

2. His conclusion that because there was no lift, it was therefore unsuitable for young children was wrong.

3. The Judge had been correct to find that there was no intervening causative act in that the Claimant could not be said to have conducted herself unreasonably or negligently.

4. There was a sufficient link between the fact that the restaurant had been misrepresented as accessible by lift and the fact that that misrepresentation caused the accident. The Judge’s conclusion that there was a causal connection was correct.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up