0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Mawdsley v Cosmos Air Plc

23 April 2002
The issues

Holidays – Package Holidays and Package Tour Regulations 1992 – stairs.

The facts

The Claimant booked a holiday in Turkey from Cosmos. She and her husband were going down stairs carrying their daughter in a pushchair, when she fell. It appeared that she lost her footing. No exact cause was established. The Claimant argued that Cosmos was liable for the injuries on the basis that the brochure stated that the hotel restaurant was accessible via a lift. It was not. Further, the brochure said the hotel was suitable for children. Claimant said it was not. A breach of duty under Regulation 4 of the Package, Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tour Regulations 1992 was alleged. In addition, the Claimant sued in misrepresentation and for breach of contract. Cosmos argued that it was not reasonably foreseeable that personal injuries would come from merely descending stairs, about which there was nothing dangerous in themselves. The Judge at first instance found that the hotel was unsuitable for children because there was so many steps that would be needed to descend or climb in order to get to the restaurant. He found that it was foreseeable that the Claimant would lose her footing whilst descending the stairs two or three times a day carrying a child’s pushchair. He found it reasonable for the Claimant to assume that the phrase “lifts (in main building)” in the brochure implied access to everything including the restaurant.

The Defendant appealed.

The decision

1. The Judge’s interpretation of the phrase in the brochure was correct.

2. His conclusion that because there was no lift, it was therefore unsuitable for young children was wrong.

3. The Judge had been correct to find that there was no intervening causative act in that the Claimant could not be said to have conducted herself unreasonably or negligently.

4. There was a sufficient link between the fact that the restaurant had been misrepresented as accessible by lift and the fact that that misrepresentation caused the accident. The Judge’s conclusion that there was a causal connection was correct.

Appeal dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.

View

Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.

View

Legal updates

Coronavirus (COVID-19) insurance considerations

With instances of COVID-19 rapidly increasing throughout the UK, many businesses are considering the options available to limit staff and customer exposure to Coronavirus.

View

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up