0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Coleman v British Gas Services

16 April 2002
The issues

Nervous shock – carbon monoxide poisoning.

The facts

The Defendants fitted a gas heater at Claimant’s home. Because of the way in which it was fitted, carbon monoxide fumes leaked into the Claimant’s lounge for 8 years until the fault was discovered and made good in 1995. At the time of the leak, both Claimants were psychologically poorly, suffering from anxiety and depression. They became convinced that they were suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning which made their anxiety worse. The Defendant admitted negligence and breaches of statutory duty, but denied any causative effect. The Claimants alleged firstly that they suffered physical effects from carbon monoxide poisoning over many years and secondly that they suffered psychological injury once the leak had been discovered. Both parts of the claim were rejected by the Judge at first instance. The Claimants appealed to the High Court Judge.

The decision

1. The period of exposure to gas had passed without any actual physical harm to the Claimants.

2. The psychological deterioration was too remote for it to be reasonable to hold the Defendants liable. The Claimants were not primary victims in the sense of Page -v- Smith – it was not reasonably foreseeable that a person of ordinary disposition might suffer psychological illness through learning that his gas fire had been leaking.
Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up