0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Bogle v MacDonalds Restaurants Limited, High Court

16 April 2002
The issues

Burns – hot drinks – restaurants – OLA.

The facts

This was one of 36 cases brought against MacDonalds and all arising out of personal injuries caused by the spillage of hot drinks/hot water. The claims were all distinct but shared a number of common features and were made the subject of a Group Litigation Order in February 2001. The majority of the Claimant’s were children, at least 16 being 4 or under at the time of the accidents. Allegations were made that MacDonalds were in breach of their duty of care in serving drinks at too high a temperature. In addition, Claimants argued that there should have been warnings and that the cups and lids used were inadequate. Allegations were made in negligence and in respect of a breach of the Occupiers Liability Act and in addition under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, alleging that the hot drinks were “defective”. The drinks were served at between 75 and 90 degrees centigrade and the evidence was to the effect that drinks served at 65 degrees would be sufficiently hot to cause burns if in contact with skin.

The decision

1. To have served drinks at lower temperatures would have been to have served drinks at temperatures that were too low from the point of view of customers expecting hot drinks.

2. As a matter of fact, the cups and lids were sufficient for their task (specifically being made to retain a hot drink if the cup was tipped over whilst the lid was on).

3. The duty on the Defendant was not to ensure that there were no accidents involving hot drinks, but to take such steps as were reasonable to avoid or reduce the risk of injury. It was not in breach of that duty.

4. There was no duty to warn customers about a risk posed by hot drinks, since the risk was patently obvious.

Action Dismissed.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up