0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Taylor v Stagecoach Midland Red, County Court, 17 August 2001

11 March 2002
The issues

Part 36 Offers – effective Payment into Court.

The facts

The Claimant had an accident and brought an action against Stagecoach. She made a Part 36 Offer to the Defendant of £21,000.00. The Defendant subsequently paid into Court £12,500.00. Later the Defendant indicated that it was willing to accept the Claimant’s Part 36 Offer. The Claimant argued that the offer was no longer there to be accepted for two reasons, firstly as a matter of Contract Law and secondly because of a clear stipulation that time for acceptance was limited.

The decision

The Payment into Court had effectively been a rejection of Claimant’s Part 36 Offer. Moreover, the stipulation as to time made acceptance impossible in any event.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up