0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Taylor v Stagecoach Midland Red, County Court, 17 August 2001

11 March 2002
The issues

Part 36 Offers – effective Payment into Court.

The facts

The Claimant had an accident and brought an action against Stagecoach. She made a Part 36 Offer to the Defendant of £21,000.00. The Defendant subsequently paid into Court £12,500.00. Later the Defendant indicated that it was willing to accept the Claimant’s Part 36 Offer. The Claimant argued that the offer was no longer there to be accepted for two reasons, firstly as a matter of Contract Law and secondly because of a clear stipulation that time for acceptance was limited.

The decision

The Payment into Court had effectively been a rejection of Claimant’s Part 36 Offer. Moreover, the stipulation as to time made acceptance impossible in any event.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up