0370 270 6000

Mahmood v Penrose

25 March 2002
The issues

Costs – Summary Assessment.

The facts

An Order was made against the Claimant, which since it included abortive Pre-Trial preparation and an adjournment of a Hearing, were substantial. At the eventual final Hearing (which the Claimants did not attend after the third day) the Judge dismissed the Claimants cases and summarily assessed the costs, including the costs of the earlier Application. The Claimants appealed on the costs point.

The decision

The Judge was wrong to summarily assess the earlier costs. Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 44 a Summary Assessment could only be made by the Judge who heard the case. Otherwise, matters should be put to a Costs Judge for Detailed Assessment.

Appeal allowed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up