0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Liverpool Victoria Infirmary v B (a child), Court of Appeal, 18 March 2002

18 February 2002
The issues

Fatal Accidents – Ogden Tables – Multipliers

The facts

The Claimant suffered from severe cerebral palsy and was 7 at the time of Trial. The Defendant had admitted negligence. An issue arose as to the multiplier to be applied for the agreed costs of future care. Relying on Claimant’s evidence (an expert Clinician) the Judge decided the Claimant’s life expectancy as 25 years. The Judge then applied Ogden Table 38 (multiplier for pecuniary loss for terms certain) at a discount of 3% arriving at a figure of 13.61. The Defendant relied upon the evidence of Professor Strauss, a Statistician who had interrogated his database as to a group of comparable age and disabilities of the Claimant. On the basis of his evidence, the additional life expectancy should have been 14.9 years. The Defendant appealed the Judge’s decision, arguing firstly that he should not have relied upon a Clinician against a Statistician and that the Statistician’s evidence was the more reliable.

The Judge should not have used Ogden Table 38 but a whole life multiplier taking account of mortality risk and which would have produced a multiplier of 10.5.

The decision

1. Whilst the Statistician’s evidence was both relevant and admissible, the Judge was entitled to prefer the evidence of the Clinician. (Thorpe LJ dissented taking the view, which seems strongly arguable to say the least, that the approach should be to begin with the statistical approach and adjust that as necessary to take account of the balance of other clinical factors in the case).

2. No discount for mortality risk was required. Once expectation of life had been determined, the only discount that would be applied was a discount for accelerated receipt. Expectation of life was to be treated as a certainty and no further discount was required. Therefore the use of Ogden Table 38 was appropriate.

Permission is being sought to appeal to the House of Lords.

focus on...

Legal updates

Insurance annual review 2019-2020

Welcome to our review of 2019 as we look ahead to what is on the horizon for the insurance sector in 2020.

View

Legal updates

Financial Services – ‘Duty of Care’ Bill: consumer protection or damp squib?

The Financial Services Duty of Care Bill (the “Bill”) was introduced into the House of Lords in October 2019 and had its second reading on 9 January 2020.

View

Legal updates

Noise-induced hearing loss claims – documentation and the expert engineer

Guest writer, Finch Consulting Senior Consultant Teli Chinelis applies his expertise in preparing engineering reports in relation to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims to explain information that is required from the claimant and information that is required and is advisable to be retained by employers, in order to ensure that claims can be fairly represented.

View

Legal updates

SRA Standards and Regulations November 2019

On Monday 25 November the 2011 SRA Handbook is replaced by the 2019 SRA Standards and Regulations (often referred to as STARS).This is the 26th version of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up