0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Chandler v Goodwin

11 March 2002
The issues

Costs – unreasonable conduct – refusal to negotiate.

The facts

The Claimant suffered carbon monoxide poisoning from her gas boiler which was leaking. Liability was admitted but the case proceeded as to causation and quantum. At Case Management, the Defendant asked for a Without Prejudice meeting for the purposes of settlement negotiations. There was no response to the suggestion. Subsequently, the Defendant suggested that Counsel meet in a round-table discussion with the aim of settling the action. Again, the request was ignored. The Defendant paid into Court £328,000.00. The Payment In was rejected. 14 days before Trial the Claimant agreed to a Without Prejudice meeting. At that meeting the Claimant’s Counsel indicated that the Claimant was looking for a figure in excess of £800,000.00. An increased offer of £378,000.00 was put forward but rejected. At Trial, the Claimant offered £525,000.00 which was rejected but settlement was reached at £475,000.00. At the Assessment Hearing in respect of costs, the Defendant argued on the basis of Claimant’s conduct, that all costs between the meeting and Trial should be disallowed on the basis that if the offer of £525,000.00 had been made at that meeting, settlement would have been achieved.

The decision

The circumstances of this case led the Costs Judge to conclude that the Claimant’s Counsel had not made any real efforts to attempt negotiations for settlement. Two thirds of Counsel’s fees were disallowed together with 10% of Claimant’s Solicitors costs from the date of the without prejudice meeting to Trial.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up