0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Alsop v Sheffield City Council, Court of Appeal

11 March 2002
The issues

Wheelie Bins – Manual Handling Regulations – foreseeability.

The facts

The Claimant was a refuse collector employed by the City Council. On part of his round there was a section of road which was higher than the pavement and houses along the side. To gain access there were steps and a concrete ramp which was at a 30-degree angle. There was one part along the route where the pavement met the road at the same level. He slipped and fell and hurt his left elbow. He claimed that he had not been properly trained and that the City Council should have provided residents with sacks to carry up and down the steps rather than wheelie bins. The Claimant failed before the Judge and appealed.

The decision

1. Following Koonjul -v- Thames Link Healthcare NHS Trust, for there to be a risk for the purposes of Regulation 4 of The Manual Handling Regulations, the Court had to find that an injury was not just a possibility but really foreseeable.

2. There was no need to train the refuse collectors to take the wheelie bin to the point where the pavement met the road at the same level.

3. There had been no previous complaints or previous accidents.

4. Apart from advising employees to use common sense there was little more the City Council could have done.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up