0370 270 6000

Alsop v Sheffield City Council, Court of Appeal

11 March 2002
The issues

Wheelie Bins – Manual Handling Regulations – foreseeability.

The facts

The Claimant was a refuse collector employed by the City Council. On part of his round there was a section of road which was higher than the pavement and houses along the side. To gain access there were steps and a concrete ramp which was at a 30-degree angle. There was one part along the route where the pavement met the road at the same level. He slipped and fell and hurt his left elbow. He claimed that he had not been properly trained and that the City Council should have provided residents with sacks to carry up and down the steps rather than wheelie bins. The Claimant failed before the Judge and appealed.

The decision

1. Following Koonjul -v- Thames Link Healthcare NHS Trust, for there to be a risk for the purposes of Regulation 4 of The Manual Handling Regulations, the Court had to find that an injury was not just a possibility but really foreseeable.

2. There was no need to train the refuse collectors to take the wheelie bin to the point where the pavement met the road at the same level.

3. There had been no previous complaints or previous accidents.

4. Apart from advising employees to use common sense there was little more the City Council could have done.

Appeal dismissed.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up