0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Quinland v Governor of H M Prison Swaleside & Others, Court of Appeal

27 February 2002
The issues

False imprisonment – liability of the Court – Order wrongly drawn up.

The facts

The Claimant sued the Governor of HM Prison Swaleside and the Lord Chancellor’s Department for false imprisonment. He was sentenced to be imprisoned for 2 years, 3 months. The Court Clerk mistakenly drew up the Order for 2 years 6 months. The Registrar of Criminal Appeals failed to correct the error despite a Direction by a Judge considering an Application for Appeal. He had subsequently appealed for leave to appeal against the conviction. That Application had been dismissed but in the course of its dismissal, the Court of Appeal highlighted the error and urged it to be checked. Thereafter, the Criminal Court of Appeal failed to act on it urgently which resulted in the Claimant serving 6 weeks longer than he needed to. The Claimant issued a claim for false imprisonment which was struck out by the District Judge. The Claimant appealed.

The decision

The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 rendered the Crown subject to liability in tort except that Section 2(v) excluded liability in respect of a person “whilst discharging or purporting to discharge any responsibilities of a Judicial nature vested in him, or any responsibilities which he had in connection with the execution of Judicial process”. The Lord Chancellor’s Department submitted that these were matters for which it had immunity.

The Court of Appeal agreed and the Appeal failed

The Court (in the person of Hale LJ expressed the hope that compensation could be given to the Claimant on an ex-gratia basis).

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up