0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Regina (Green) v Police Complaints Authority & Others H.C.

22 January 2002
The issues

Complaint against Police Officers – disclosure of statements by Complaints Authority.

The facts

The Claimant sought a judicial review of the refusal by the Police Complaints Authority on 3rd April 2001 to disclose witnesses statements made during the Police Authority’s investigations of a complaint that the Police Officer and others had caused the complainant serious injury when they chased and ran over him in an unmarked Police vehicle. The Authority relied on Section 80(i)(a) Police Act 1996 providing that no information received by the Authority in connection with their function should be disclosed to any other person except “so far as may be necessary for the proper discharge of the functions of the Authority”.

The decision

In order to read Section 80 in a way which was compliant with the European Convention of Human Rights and in particular the Claimant’s right to life under Article 2 and is right not to be subjected to in-human or degrading treatment under Article 3, Section 80 had to be read in a way which ensured disclosure of documents allowing the Claimant to take part fully in the investigative process. This over-rode any principles of confidentiality. Police reports and comments should not be disclosed but he was entitled to comment on the factual accounts of the same incident provided by eye witnesses. Disclosure should be made on the basis that it was only for the purpose of reviewing the complainant’s comments and not for disclosure to others. The application succeeded.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


Legal updates

Non-payment of insurance premiums during the Coronavirus pandemic

The forced closure of many businesses as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic has had a huge impact on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Recent reports from the Office for National Statistics state that the economy was 25% smaller in April than it was in February this year.


Legal updates

Reinstatement for property damage losses – when does it apply?

The Court of Appeal has recently considered the correct test for measuring the indemnity for property damage losses and has provided useful guidance on whether an insured needs to intend to reinstate the property to its pre-loss condition.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up