0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Limited and Others, Court of Appeal

14 January 2002
The issues

Mesothelioma – exposure to asbestos dust in the course of employment by more than one employer – applicability of Occupiers Liability Act.

The facts

The Court of Appeal sat on this and five other appeals in which similar issues arose relating to material contribution.

The decision
  1. In Fairchild, Fox and Matthews, the court held that the claimant could not recover damages. Mesothelioma, unlike asbestosis or pneumoconiosis is a single, indivisible disease. The claimant could not establish on the balance of probabilities when he inhaled the asbestos fibre, which caused the cell in the pleura to become malignant.
  2. In many cases the defendants may no longer survive. In Fairchild none of the relevant employers were available. In Matthews only two of the three most likely defendants were available.
  3. It could not be right that once one tort feasor was before the court, the court could find that tort feasor notionally liable on the balance of probabilities for the whole of the claimant’s injuries.
  4. In Babcock, Fairchild and Dyson the court found no liability attaching to an occupier under the OLA from the mere fact of exposure to asbestos dust in premises of which the defendant was the occupier. Section 2(ii) (the duty to ensure that a visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises) relates to the static condition or ‘occupancy liability’ of the premises. It does not concern itself with ‘activity liability’. Any liability in respect of a danger to which workmen may be exposed as a consequence of activities performed on the premises, falls to be decided by common law or by some other statute.

focus on...

Legal updates

Tips for dealing with Litigants in Person

This article provides some tips to bear in mind when dealing with Litigants in Person and a reminder of a number of pieces of guidance, to assist in-house teams in dealing with Litigants in Person in disputes or court/tribunal proceedings.


Legal updates

Extending the scope of fixed recoverable costs: Ministry of Justice consultation

In March 2019, the Ministry of Justice launched a formal consultation (which came to an end on 6 June 2019) aimed at extending the use of fixed recoverable costs in civil claims.


Legal updates

Are redress schemes the answer to improving the way abuse claims are dealt with?

The search for improved ways of dealing with abuse claims has put a spotlight on redress schemes; with Manchester City football club recently announcing a scheme and Lambeth Council providing a ‘half time’ assessment of their scheme.


Legal updates

Lifting the roof on the 'same roof rule'

The Government has recently announced the abolition of the 'same roof rule' which prevented victims of crime (particularly historical abuse) from claiming a CICA payment if they were assaulted by someone they lived with, as members of the same family, before 1979. The reform will be costly.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up