0370 270 6000

Cowl and Others v Plymouth City Council, Court of Appeal, 14 December 2001

14 January 2002
The issues

Judicial Review – closure of care home – alternative dispute resolution.

The facts

Plymouth City Council wished to close Granby Way Residential Care Home. The Claimant and 6 other residents of the Home sought Judicial Review of that decision.

The decision

The Appeal was dismissed. In so doing however Lord Woolf passed some remarks with regard to the applicability of ADR. He commented that litigants whether in cases involving public Authorities or not paid insufficient attention to resolving disputes by means of ADR. A Court should take an active role in this area and carefully scrutinise Applications for Judicial Review and make sure using their powers under the Civil Procedure Rules, that the parties tried to resolve the dispute with the minimum involvement of the Courts. The Court might for example decide to hold an inter-parties Hearing at which the parties would have to explain what steps they had taken to resolve the dispute without resorting to litigation.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.



Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.


Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.


Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up