0370 270 6000

Williams v Green, Court of Appeal

14 December 2001
The issues

Future loss of earnings – chance of promotion – pre-existing condition.

The facts

Defendant appealed from the decision of the Recorder awarding the Claimant inter alia £163,000.00 for future loss of earnings. At the date of the Trial the Claimant was a Deputy Head Teacher. She would however have to take early retirement on the grounds of ill health and would not gain promotion to the post of Head Teacher.

She had sought promotion before the accident. Evidence had been given at Trial in support of her contention that she would have been appointed to the post of Head Teacher by 2003. The Judge concluded that she would have continued as a Teacher despite her pre-existing condition and would have been appointed Head Teacher in 2003.

The Defendant appealed on the basis that this was the wrong approach.

The decision

1. There was no dispute between the parties that the Claimant’s future earnings should be assessed on the basis that she would have been appointed Head Teacher in 2003.

2. The Judge had taken into account her pre-existing back problems in concluding that she would have become Head Teacher by that date. However, he treated it as a certainty. This was not the correct approach on the evidence.

3. The assessment fell between the different arguments from the parties. The Claimant sought to support the Judge’s 100% assessment. The Defendant argued that 20% was more appropriate on the evidence. Before taking into account all the relevant matters relating to her pre-accident back problems the 100% loss of earnings applied by the Judge would be substituted by 60%. [She had suffered from back problems before but had never been incapacitated by them].

Focus on...

Legal updates

Court of Appeal confirms exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies in Canadian pipeline dispute

On 10 June 2022 the Court of Appeal upheld an anti-suit injunction granted in favour of insurers by Mr Justice Jacobs in September 2021 restraining proceedings from being brought in Canada and enforcing the exclusive English jurisdiction clause in excess liability policies.

View

Blogs

Payment Fraud landscape shaped by technology in 2021

Payment systems across Europe are under increased pressure to mitigate fraud risks and defend against persistent attacks from enablers using ever more sophisticated and malicious viruses and malware.

View

Legal updates

Gosden and another v Halliwell Landau and another [2021] EWHC 159 (Comm)

This claim addressed the question, of when the date for assessment of damages in cases of negligence should be determined and shows that when appropriate the Courts will depart from the default position.

View

Legal updates

Assessing the scope of employers liability – Chell v Tarmac

These were the opening remarks of Mr Justice Martin Spencer when handing down his Judgment in the recent case of Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited [2020] EWHC 2613, the latest in a series of appeals dealing with the scope of vicarious liability.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up