0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Williams v Green, Court of Appeal

14 December 2001
The issues

Future loss of earnings – chance of promotion – pre-existing condition.

The facts

Defendant appealed from the decision of the Recorder awarding the Claimant inter alia £163,000.00 for future loss of earnings. At the date of the Trial the Claimant was a Deputy Head Teacher. She would however have to take early retirement on the grounds of ill health and would not gain promotion to the post of Head Teacher.

She had sought promotion before the accident. Evidence had been given at Trial in support of her contention that she would have been appointed to the post of Head Teacher by 2003. The Judge concluded that she would have continued as a Teacher despite her pre-existing condition and would have been appointed Head Teacher in 2003.

The Defendant appealed on the basis that this was the wrong approach.

The decision

1. There was no dispute between the parties that the Claimant’s future earnings should be assessed on the basis that she would have been appointed Head Teacher in 2003.

2. The Judge had taken into account her pre-existing back problems in concluding that she would have become Head Teacher by that date. However, he treated it as a certainty. This was not the correct approach on the evidence.

3. The assessment fell between the different arguments from the parties. The Claimant sought to support the Judge’s 100% assessment. The Defendant argued that 20% was more appropriate on the evidence. Before taking into account all the relevant matters relating to her pre-accident back problems the 100% loss of earnings applied by the Judge would be substituted by 60%. [She had suffered from back problems before but had never been incapacitated by them].

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up