0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Robertson v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council, Queen's Bench Division, 16 November 2001

3 December 2001
The issues

Sale of electoral register by local authority – authority refusing to remove voters name – whether breach of Human Rights.

The facts

The local authority had sold the information contained on the electoral register to a commercial organisation. They refused to remove the Claimant’s name from the register as supplied to the commercial organisation. He alleged that the refusal were in breach of his rights under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 3 of the First Protocol.

The decision

The local authority had the duty of preparing and publishing a register of parliamentary and local government electors annually. They were required to supply a copy to any person on payment of a fee. There was no provision in the Representation of the People Regulations 2001 for registers to be edited. Domestic law therefore failed to comply with Article 14 (the right to object) of Directive 95/46/EC on data protection.

It was foreseeable that the sale of the Register would effect electors in that they would become marketing targets. The practise of selling the register to commercial concerns without forwarding individual electors the right of objection was a disproportionate way of giving effects to the legitimate objective of retaining a commercially available register. The Claimant’s Article 8 rights were therefore breached. Moreover if the regulations made the right to vote conditional upon the name appearing on the register with no individual right of objection they would contravene Article 3 of the first protocol.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).


Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.


Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.


Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up