0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Morris v Bank of India, Chancery Division, 15 November 2001

3 December 2001
The issues

Procedure – Evidence – Disclosure of Instructions.

The facts

The parties to this action had to disclose banking evidence following which a memorandum of agreed and disputed issues was to be produced prior to exchange of witness statements. The reports were exchanged. Claimants required replies to questions. Claimants were not satisfied with the replies contending amongst other matters that the replies raised factual allegations not made in the Pleadings or the Disclosed Documents and that the Report did not identify all the instructions on which it had been based. The Defendant’s argued that it was inappropriate to order the production of draft witness statements because they were privileged. The Claimants sought an Order that the Defendants serve a document containing all of the underlying information relied upon by their banking expert.

The decision

1. An expert report should contain a statement setting out the contents of all instructions relied upon.

2. In this case the Experts Report had to be exchanged prior to factual witness statements.

3. The Report was defective because it did not contain a statement of the substance of material instructions.

4. It was therefore open to the Court to order disclosure of the Instructions given for the purpose of the Report.

5. If the expert had been provided with draft witness statements which he had been told not to refer to but to use the information in them for his report then the witness statements would lose their privilege because they then formed part of the instructions.

Claimants were entitled to the Order sought.

focus on...

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

Legal and regulatory monthly update - September 2019

The latest update covering delegated authority, insurance product development, the senior insurance managers regime, data protection, operational control frameworks, Lloyds market, and horizon scanning.

View

Legal updates

Kuoni referred to the CJEU by Supreme Court for clarification - possible impact on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility claims for sexual abuse and assault

We were hoping to be able to give you some interesting insights following the judgment of X v Kuoni Travel Ltd but that will have to wait for another day.

View

Legal updates

The disappearance of LIBOR

Companies should undertake a comprehensive review and audit to identify those products and legacy contracts that are LIBOR-linked and carry out an in-depth risk assessment of discontinuation. Where possible, companies should look at appointing an individual to oversee the programme.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up